Skip to content
Compliance

Walk Into the Audit With AI Evidence Already Collected

Seven frameworks pre-mapped to 53 controls, evidence generated continuously, signed bundles exported in one click, and an AI Register that maintains itself.

What Keeps You Up

AI Questions With No Evidence Behind Them

  • New audit scope. Auditors now ask about AI governance, and the control set was written before AI agents existed.
  • Manual collection. Evidence is assembled by hand each cycle from screenshots and spreadsheets.
  • Silent regressions. A control that was proven in March can quietly lose its evidence by June.
  • The EU AI Act. Register and risk-tier obligations require an inventory nobody is maintaining.
Answers

The Questions You Can Now Answer

  • Which controls are proven right now, and which are partial or unproven?
  • What evidence supports SOC 2 CC6.1 for AI tooling this quarter?
  • Which AI systems are in use, at what risk tier, approved by whom?
  • Has any control lost its evidence since the last review?
  • Can we hand an auditor a verifiable package without a two-week collection cycle?
Compliance coverage view showing the gap between claimed and proven control coverage with a per-control grid
Control coverage - the gap between claimed and proven coverage, with every control resolving to the evidence behind it.

See Your Coverage Before the Audit Does

A walkthrough of framework coverage, evidence bundles, and the AI Register on live fleet data.

[email protected]kraitos.io